Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] PEDNR WG Survey Results Reorganized

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, the comments are removed for convenience to focus on the yes/no/no strong 
view/other responses. No, this does not replace the survey results as 
originally compiled, the intention of the document is to facilitate review of 
the results on today’s call. It is the expectation that everyone has reviewed 
the complete survey, including all responses so that we can use this 
abbreviated version for the discussion. Again, if members of the WG prefer to 
go through the complete survey, that’s up to the group.

With best regards,

Marika

On 23/03/10 12:27, "Sivasubramanian Muthusamy" <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My comments are removed in this 'reorganized' document. Is this for 
convenience? And does this 'reorganized' document replace the survey results as 
originally compiled?

Sivasubramanian Muthusamy



On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
Dear All,

In order to facilitate the review of the responses to the PEDNR WG survey on 
today’s call, I have created the attached document which aims to group together 
the responses based on the level of agreement. In this way, the group could 
first focus on those issues where there seems to be broad support for one 
approach over another and leave those where there are very different views 
until the end. I have also taken the liberty to highlight some of the responses 
qualified as ‘other’ where the respondent seems to provide a clear yes or no, 
so that the group can take that into account when reviewing the question.

Again, this is just a tool to facilitate the review and discussion of the 
results of the survey and it is up to the WG whether you want to use it or not. 
If there are any other suggestions, please feel free to share those with the 
list.

With best regards,

Marika