<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-pednr-dt] Redrafted option on Question 14.
- To: pednr <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Redrafted option on Question 14.
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:01:32 -0400
The current version of the entire question is:
14. Should the fee to be charged for renewal of a domain name after
expiration be explicitly stated? [Charter Question ???]
Issue: The EDDP required that the fee charged for recovery during the
Recovery Grace Period be clearly displayed on the registrar web site
(if there is one), but made no such requirement of the fee for
post-expiration renewal prior to the RGP.
Options: Select one:
a) Modify the Expired Domain Deletion Policy (EDDP) so that the cost
for recovery after expiration is available to the registrant at the
time of registration or previous renewal.
b) Suggest that registrars develop a best practice related display of
the fee for post-expiration renewal.
c) Maintain status quo - leave it at the discretion of registrars to
ensure that such fees are published.
---------------
I propose changing Option a) to
a) Modify the Expired Domain Deletion Policy (EDDP) to require that
the web site should state, both at the time of registration or
renewal and in a clear place on its web site, the fee for renewal of
a domain name after expiration.
This essentially takes the wording of RAA 3.7.5.6 and applies it to
post-expiration renewal instead of RGP recovery.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|