RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Verizon Case for Expired Domains - The Defendants Respond

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well, it might well be. If we knew or cared enough about who had 
registered the names in question to start with.
Not high on my priority list at the moment.  Perhaps later...

Alan

At 25/05/2010 05:46 PM, Mason Cole wrote:
> Interesting enough, though doesn't appear to have anything to do with
> recovery of an unintentionally lost domain name.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:44 AM
> To: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Verizon Case for Expired Domains - The
> Defendants Respond
>
>
> Their point about Verizon (like many ISPs) intercepting
> domain-not-found's and presenting a monetized page is not
> inappropriate. Unfortunately for the defendants, Verizon can do this
> without the nicety of registering the name first, so there is no
> possibility of UDRP action.
>
> Alan
>
> At 25/05/2010 10:33 AM, berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> >Hot off the press.....
> >
> >http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/25/two-defendants-respond-to-verizon-
> cybersquatting-lawsuit/
> >
> >Berry Cobb
> >Infinity Portals LLC
> >berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://www.infinityportals.com
> >866.921.8891