<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Verizon Case for Expired Domains - The Defendants Respond
- To: "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, <berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Verizon Case for Expired Domains - The Defendants Respond
- From: "Mason Cole" <masonc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:46:50 -0700
Interesting enough, though doesn't appear to have anything to do with
recovery of an unintentionally lost domain name.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:44 AM
To: berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Verizon Case for Expired Domains - The
Defendants Respond
Their point about Verizon (like many ISPs) intercepting
domain-not-found's and presenting a monetized page is not
inappropriate. Unfortunately for the defendants, Verizon can do this
without the nicety of registering the name first, so there is no
possibility of UDRP action.
Alan
At 25/05/2010 10:33 AM, berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Hot off the press.....
>
>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/25/two-defendants-respond-to-verizon-
cybersquatting-lawsuit/
>
>Berry Cobb
>Infinity Portals LLC
>berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.infinityportals.com
>866.921.8891
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|