Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Another try at a middle ground

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Michael, it is not what I wanted going into this, 
but at this stage, I am willing to accept it.
Thanks for having a go at this.

Alan

At 01/02/2011 01:22 PM, Michael Young wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Below is a recommendation crafted out as a 
> ?suggested?  middle ground and it is intended to 
> replace both the guaranteed recovery period 
> proposal suggested by  James and Alan?s proposal are darkening the domain.
> In this version, there is not a complete 
> darkening of the domain, but the DNS resolution 
> path is expected to be interrupted 
> (redirection). Where the guaranteed recovery 
> period occurs during the 45 day grace period is 
> now at the discretion of the Registrar ? this 
> should minimize (or hopefully eliminate) impact 
> to existing business models.   If this doesn?t 
> get the attention of a registrant that has gone 
> awol, then I really don?t know what cost effective/reasonable measure could.
> This also allows Registrars to charge a premium 
> for renewals after expiry but prior to RGP, but 
> as I read the rest of the recommendations, that 
> knowledge would be made explicitly available to 
> the registrant prior to expiration.
> New Recommendation:
>
> For at least 8 concurrent days, at some point 
> following expiration, the original DNS 
> resolution path of the RAE, at the time of 
> expiration, must be interrupted, and the domain 
> must be renewable by the RAE until the end of that period.
> This 8-day period may occur at any time following expiration.
>
> Notwithstanding, the registrar may delete the 
> domain at any time during the Auto-renew grace period.
>
>
> Is this something that might work for both sides here?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Michael Young
> Vice President, Product Development
> Afilias
> O:416-673-4109
> M:+1-647-289-1220