ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-pednr-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Another try at a middle ground

  • To: "Michael Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Another try at a middle ground
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:40:13 -0700

<html><body><span style="font-family:Arial; color:#000000; 
font-size:10pt;"><div>It's certainly worth discussing.&nbsp; One concern would 
be that the current wording seems to give registrars the option of explicitly 
deleting the name while the 8-day period is on going.&nbsp; Or am I missing 
something?<br><br>J.</div><div><br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid 
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black; 
font-family: verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Another try at a middle ground<br>
From: "Michael Young" &lt;<a 
href="mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>&gt;<br>
Date: Tue, February 01, 2011 12:22 pm<br>
To: "PEDNR" &lt;<a 
href="mailto:gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx</a>&gt;<br>
<br>
<style>
 #wmQuoteWrapper /* Font Definitions */ @font-face  {font-family:Calibri; 
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
 #wmQuoteWrapper /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, #wmQuoteWrapper 
li.MsoNormal, #wmQuoteWrapper div.MsoNormal  {margin:0cm; 
margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; 
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
 #wmQuoteWrapper a:link, #wmQuoteWrapper span.MsoHyperlink  
{mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;}
 #wmQuoteWrapper a:visited, #wmQuoteWrapper span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed  
{mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;}
 #wmQuoteWrapper span.EmailStyle17  {mso-style-type:personal-compose; 
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;}
 #wmQuoteWrapper .MsoChpDefault  {mso-style-type:export-only; 
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
 #wmQuoteWrapper @page WordSection1  {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 
72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
 #wmQuoteWrapper div.WordSection1  {page:WordSection1;}

</style><div class="WordSection1"><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;">Hi all,<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;">Below is a recommendation crafted out as a 
“suggested”&nbsp; middle ground and it is intended to replace both the 
guaranteed recovery period proposal suggested by &nbsp;James and Alan’s 
proposal are darkening the domain.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;">In this version, there is not a complete darkening of 
the domain, but the DNS resolution path is expected to be interrupted 
(redirection). Where the guaranteed recovery period occurs during the 45 day 
grace period is now at the discretion of the Registrar – this should minimize 
(or hopefully eliminate) impact to existing business models. &nbsp;&nbsp;If 
this doesn’t get the attention of a registrant that has gone awol, then I 
really don’t know what cost effective/reasonable measure 
could.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;">This also allows Registrars to charge a premium for 
renewals after expiry but prior to RGP, but as I read the rest of the 
recommendations, that knowledge would be made explicitly available to the 
registrant prior to expiration.<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;">New Recommendation:<o:p></o:p></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">For at least 8 concurrent days, at 
some point following expiration, the original DNS resolution path of the RAE, 
at the time of expiration, must be interrupted, and the domain must be 
renewable by the RAE until the end of that period. <o:p></o:p></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">This 8-day period may occur at any 
time following expiration. <o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;">Notwithstanding, the registrar may delete the domain at 
any time during the Auto-renew grace period.<o:p></o:p></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;">Is this something that might work for 
both sides here?<o:p></o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="">Best 
Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><span style=""><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="">Michael Young 
<o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span 
style="">Vice President, Product Development <o:p></o:p></span></div><div 
class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="">Afilias 
<o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" style="font-size:12pt;"><span 
style="">O:416-673-4109 <o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><span style="">M:+1-647-289-1220 
<o:p></o:p></span></div><div class="MsoNormal" 
style="font-size:12pt;"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy