RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Another try at a middle ground

["Michael Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

However Alan said it much more eloquently  J

 

 

Michael Young

 

M:+1-647-289-1220

 

From: afilias@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:afilias@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: February-01-11 1:54 PM
To: James M. Bladel
Cc: PEDNR; Michael Young
Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Another try at a middle ground

 

That's ok by the IP guys, because during RGP, the RAE can still get the name 
back and so they are always ok with a delete action.

 

-M

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] Another try at a middle ground
From: "James M. Bladel" < <mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx> jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, February 01, 2011 11:40 am
To: "Michael Young" < <mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "PEDNR" < <mailto:gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx> gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>

It's certainly worth discussing.  One concern would be that the current wording 
seems to give registrars the option of explicitly deleting the name while the 
8-day period is on going.  Or am I missing something?

J.

 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-pednr-dt] Another try at a middle ground
From: "Michael Young" < <mailto:myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, February 01, 2011 12:22 pm
To: "PEDNR" < <mailto:gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx> gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi all,

 

Below is a recommendation crafted out as a “suggested”  middle ground and it is 
intended to replace both the guaranteed recovery period proposal suggested by  
James and Alan’s proposal are darkening the domain.

 

In this version, there is not a complete darkening of the domain, but the DNS 
resolution path is expected to be interrupted (redirection). Where the 
guaranteed recovery period occurs during the 45 day grace period is now at the 
discretion of the Registrar – this should minimize (or hopefully eliminate) 
impact to existing business models.   If this doesn’t get the attention of a 
registrant that has gone awol, then I really don’t know what cost 
effective/reasonable measure could.

 

This also allows Registrars to charge a premium for renewals after expiry but 
prior to RGP, but as I read the rest of the recommendations, that knowledge 
would be made explicitly available to the registrant prior to expiration.

 

New Recommendation:

 

For at least 8 concurrent days, at some point following expiration, the 
original DNS resolution path of the RAE, at the time of expiration, must be 
interrupted, and the domain must be renewable by the RAE until the end of that 
period. 

This 8-day period may occur at any time following expiration. 

 

Notwithstanding, the registrar may delete the domain at any time during the 
Auto-renew grace period.

 

 

 

Is this something that might work for both sides here?

 

 

 

Best Regards,

 

Michael Young 

Vice President, Product Development 

Afilias 

O:416-673-4109 

M:+1-647-289-1220