Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Draft Motion for GNSO
- To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] Draft Motion for GNSO
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:15:42 -0500
having just dragged the poor IRTP WG through this discussion, let me offer the
strong suggestion that we not rush through this motion. none of us really
focused on a couple of key issues in the motion until we looked at in on the
call and realized that there were some subtle but substantive problems with the
way the motion was worded.
my preference would be that we review the motion on a call -- but if that can't
happen then let me say this
TAKE A HARD LOOK AT THIS MOTION PEEPUL!!
we owe it to ourselves and all the work that we've done as a group to make sure
that this motion is absolutely right BEFORE it is made. we're in an awkward
position with IRTP because the motion has already been made and changes are now
outside of the control of the working group.
On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> I am attaching the motion which Marika drafted. She passed it by me and after
> a cursory look at it said it was ok. On further consideration, I see that I
> did not look at it carefully enough.
> Specifically, I did not notice that the motion divided the Recommendations
> into several groups, only one of which is to be sent to the Board for their
> I strongly feel that the entire set of recommendations should be passed to
> the Board.
> Recommendation 17 (Registrars must point to new education material) in
> particular *MUST* go to the Board as it was the intent that this become part
> of the RAA, just as the current Registrant Rights and Responsibilities
> document was included in the last RAA revision.
> Recommendation 16 (develop education material) and 18 (compliance follow-up
> and reporting) request ICANN Staff action, and the should have the weight of
> the Board accepting them to ensure that the work is funded and done.
> And I believe that for consistency, Recommendations 10, 11 and 12 (Best
> Practices) should go to the Board as well, although that is of less import.
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)