RE: [gnso-pednr-dt] PEDNR Recommendations 16, 17

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Whether they take it down now or not, a diagram like that is helpful.
Some of this group might consider proposing an updated lifecycle diagram
that depics reality when the PEDNR recommendations are approved.

I think that Staff will need to review the Rights and Responsibilities
and update it as necessary to be sure appropriate IRTP-B and PEDNR
policy changes are captured (after Council and Board approval of
course). And that would be a good time to propose an updated lifecycle
diagram.

Tim  
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-pednr-dt] PEDNR Recommendations 16, 17
From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, June 28, 2011 10:35 am
To: Berry Cobb <berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <gnso-pednr-dt@xxxxxxxxx>

hm.  that's a truly terrible diagram and implies a uniformity across
registrars that we all know isn't the case.

so Margie, why don't you ask the ICANN folks to take that down.  it's
very misleading.


mikey



On Jun 27, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Berry Cobb wrote:

I guess you can say Recommendation #16 is complete (to a certain
degree).
 
A footnote to the Registrant Rights & Responsibilities, just posted by
ICANN today, references the gTLD lifecycle.
http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/registrant-rights-responsibilities-en.htm
http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/gtld-lifecycle.htm (footnote #1)
 
I understand that the PEDNR recommendations are not consensus policy,
because the Council has yet to vote and of course implement.  Despite
this, I was under the impression that no Working Group member was
pleased with the accuracy and representation of this the gTLD lifecycle
diagram.  I cannot speak for other members, but I certainly do not
support it.  Plus, my worst fears are being realized by ICANN promoting
this diagram and the conundrum I predicted is starting to materialize. 
If I recall correctly during WG deliberations there was a lack of
support for any specific recommendation that a process diagram outlining
the Expiration process be created.
 
No doubt if PEDNR recommendations are adopted, then this diagram becomes
invalid.  My question back to the WG, absent any CP on PEDNR
recommendations, is should ICANN & the Community even advertise this
gTLD lifecycle diagram to begin with?
 
I look forward to hearing responses.  Thanks.
 
As a side note…..  The RtRRof2009RAA makes for some great bedtime
reading.  I am not familiar with the project plan for rolling out this
material, but I hope there is a more exciting platform for Registrants
to digest this information. Else, we may encounter the same results with
Rt reading of Registrants Agreements, TOCs, etc…
 
 
Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://infinityportals.com
720.839.5735
 




- - - - - - - - -
phone  651-647-6109  
fax   866-280-2356  
web  http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)