RE: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I like that better Greg.  I almost suggested the change to ‘with’ but decided I 
could live with ‘to’.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shatan, Gregory S.
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 7:04 PM
To: 'Tim Ruiz'; Eduardo Diaz
Cc: Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter

I would suggest a couple of minor changes to Eduardo’s change, as follows: "A 
framework for implementation-related discussions associated with GNSO Policy 
Recommendations;"

Greg

From: 
owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx]<mailto:[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx]>
 On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 6:49 PM
To: Eduardo Diaz
Cc: Marika Konings; 
gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter

I'm ok with this change.

On Jul 1, 2013, at 5:43 PM, "Eduardo Diaz" 
<eduardodiazrivera@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:eduardodiazrivera@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The wording used in #3 under the Mission & Scope - "A framework for 
implementation related discussions related to GNSO Policy Recommendations" -  
is cacophonous. May I suggest to use the following: "A framework for 
implementation related discussions associated to GNSO Policy Recommendations;"

-ed


On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Dear All,

Please find attached for final review the latest version of the WG Charter 
which includes the edits discussed today. To facilitate your review, you'll 
find attached a clean as well as a redline version.

Please share any comments / edits you may have with the mailing list at the 
latest by 23.59 UTC on Tuesday 2 July.

Based on the feedback received at that point, we'll decide whether or not to go 
ahead with the meeting on Wednesday 3 July at 19.00 UTC.

The proposed motion will follow tomorrow.

Best regards,

Marika



--
NOTICE: This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject 
to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part 
of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the 
sender and delete this message immediately.



* * *

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may 
well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice 
of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete 
this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any 
purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your 
cooperation.

* * *

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you that, 
unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice contained in 
this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended or written to 
be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under 
the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local provisions or (2) 
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters 
addressed herein.

Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00