<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
- To: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
- From: Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:02:55 -0400
+1
-ed
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Shatan, Gregory S. <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> I would suggest a couple of minor changes to Eduardo’s change, as
> follows: *"A framework for implementation-related discussions associated
> with GNSO Policy Recommendations;"*
>
> * *
>
> *Greg*****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Tim Ruiz
> *Sent:* Monday, July 01, 2013 6:49 PM
> *To:* Eduardo Diaz
> *Cc:* Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-policyimpl-dt] For final review - proposed WG Charter
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm ok with this change.****
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2013, at 5:43 PM, "Eduardo Diaz" <eduardodiazrivera@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:****
>
> The wording used in #3 under the Mission & Scope - *"A framework for
> implementation related discussions related to GNSO Policy Recommendations"
> - *is cacophonous*. *May I suggest to use the following:* "A framework
> for implementation related discussions associated to GNSO Policy
> Recommendations;"* ****
>
> ** **
>
> -ed****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:****
>
> Dear All,****
>
> ** **
>
> Please find attached for final review the latest version of the WG Charter
> which includes the edits discussed today. To facilitate your review, you'll
> find attached a clean as well as a redline version. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Please share any comments / edits you may have with the mailing list *at
> the latest by 23.59 UTC on Tuesday 2 July*. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Based on the feedback received at that point, we'll decide whether or not
> to go ahead with the meeting on Wednesday 3 July at 19.00 UTC.****
>
> ** **
>
> The proposed motion will follow tomorrow.****
>
> ** **
>
> Best regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> Marika****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or
> subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
> addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
> disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
> mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. ***
> *
>
>
>
> * * *
>
> This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and
> may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are
> on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
> then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it
> for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you
> for your cooperation.
>
> * * *
>
> To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you
> that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice
> contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
> intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1)
> avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and
> local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
> party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
>
> Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00
>
>
--
*NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or
subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named
addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use,
disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by
mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|