Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Revised Agenda

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

well that is a good twosome, 
if i ever i saw a good twosome.
and it covers both houses.

avri

On 21 Aug 2013, at 15:22, Shatan, Gregory S. wrote:

> I would note that J. Scott Evans also threw his hat in the ring for Chair.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 3:19 PM
> To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Revised Agenda
> 
> 
> good idea
> 
> 
> i think a co-chair or two is a good thing.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 21 Aug 2013, at 14:58, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
>> Thanks (I think) Tim.  I would be willing to do so if the WG members are 
>> supportive but I think that a co-chair scenario would be best for this WG so 
>> whether I would be one of the co-chairs with someone else or whether the 
>> co-chairs are two other people, I think that would be a good idea.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:53 PM
>> To: Neuman, Jeff
>> Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Revised Agenda
>> 
>> I am having some difficulties and may not be able to join the call. However, 
>> since no one else has piped in yet on the Chair issue, I would like to 
>> nominate Chuck Gomes for Chair if he is willing to accept.