Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Redlined GAC Letter

[mcubberley <mcubberley@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Chuck,

In my view, the letter is a very clear explanation of a complex subject, and a 
thoughtful invitation to the GAC to participate formally.

I have two suggestions for consideration:

1. At the beginning of the numbered points, points 1 and 2 regarding ICANN Core 
Values include examples in parenthesis. The neutral tone of the letter would be 
strengthened by eliminating the examples.

2. Point 5.b refers to "flavors" of policy. This English language descriptor 
might be better understood by all if this point contained either a brief 
explanation of what is meant by "flavors" or a link to earlier discussions 
where this term was first used.

Again, excellent letter.

Respectfully,
Maureen

Maureen Cubberley
+1.705.382.3841
+1.705.718.5723

On 2013-10-16, at 8:14 AM, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> One of our agenda items for our meeting today is to discuss a letter to the 
> GAC.  Note that we sent letters to the other ACs and the SOs but we did not 
> yet send a letter to the GAC because we thought it best to customize the GAC 
> letter somewhat.  Marika and I made some edits to the letter we sent to the 
> other groups to create the attached letter; our edits are redlined.
>  
> Please review it before today’s call if possible so we can hopefully decide 
> whether or not to send it.  Additional edits are welcome.
>  
> Chuck
> “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from 
> disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work 
> product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify 
> sender immediately and delete this message immediately.”
> 
> <GAC Letter from P&I WG - Redline draft 16 Oct 13.doc>