<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Redlined GAC Letter
- To: mcubberley <mcubberley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Redlined GAC Letter
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:11:18 +0000
Thanks Maureen. Let’s discuss these on our upcoming call.
Chuck
From: mcubberley [mailto:mcubberley@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 2:09 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Redlined GAC Letter
Hello Chuck,
In my view, the letter is a very clear explanation of a complex subject, and a
thoughtful invitation to the GAC to participate formally.
I have two suggestions for consideration:
1. At the beginning of the numbered points, points 1 and 2 regarding ICANN Core
Values include examples in parenthesis. The neutral tone of the letter would be
strengthened by eliminating the examples.
2. Point 5.b refers to "flavors" of policy. This English language descriptor
might be better understood by all if this point contained either a brief
explanation of what is meant by "flavors" or a link to earlier discussions
where this term was first used.
Again, excellent letter.
Respectfully,
Maureen
Maureen Cubberley
+1.705.382.3841
+1.705.718.5723
On 2013-10-16, at 8:14 AM, "Gomes, Chuck"
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
One of our agenda items for our meeting today is to discuss a letter to the
GAC. Note that we sent letters to the other ACs and the SOs but we did not yet
send a letter to the GAC because we thought it best to customize the GAC letter
somewhat. Marika and I made some edits to the letter we sent to the other
groups to create the attached letter; our edits are redlined.
Please review it before today’s call if possible so we can hopefully decide
whether or not to send it. Additional edits are welcome.
Chuck
“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that
is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender
immediately and delete this message immediately.”
<GAC Letter from P&I WG - Redline draft 16 Oct 13.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|