Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For final review - PI Workplan

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Michael,

The questions for the sub-teams are included in the second tab of the work
plan. Including it in the same sheet may make it too long and messy?

Best regards,

Marika

From:  Gnosis IP Law & Consulting <gnosisiplaw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Friday 29 November 2013 07:19
To:  Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc:  "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For final review - PI Workplan

Marika: 

Looks great, and good updates.  I would like to include the
Questions/Considerations that you included in the version distributed for BA
with the various Sub-Teams ‹ either as linked-to documents or cells after
the Schedule.

Michael R.

On Nov 28, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> Please find attached for 'final' review the proposed work plan for the Policy
> & Implementation Working Group, as supported by those WG members present in
> Buenos Aires. Do note that I've made a couple of small updates to reflect the
> current status of the definitions and deliverable 0B sub-teams. As discussed,
> this is intended to be a live document that will be updated over time to
> reflect progress (or lack thereof) of WG & sub-team activities. If no further
> comments are received by next week's WG meeting (Wednesday 4 December), we'll
> go ahead and post this version on the wiki and share it with the GNSO Council
> for their information.
> 
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika 
> <PI Workplan Updated 28 November 2013.xls>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature