RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: [council] Message from Policy & Implementation WG
Thank you very much for sending Mikey's feedback to the WG list Amr. That is very helpful. To save all members from going to the Council email archives, it would be helpful if you also forwarded your response(s) to the P&I WG list. I attached versions of the two documents with my personal responses to Mikey's input. I encourage WG members to review them to facilitate our discussion of them in our WG meeting in Singapore. Amr - If you think it would be useful, please feel free to forward my personal responses to Mikey and/or the full Council. Chuck From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:24 PM To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: [council] Message from Policy & Implementation WG Hi all, The "Principles" and "Working Definitions" documents have been sent to the GNSO Council as an update on the WG's progress. Mikey O'Connor had some comments attached below. I've already provided a preliminary response, but believe it's important to have the WG collectively look at these as well, consider them and provide responses as it sees fit. Thanks. Amr Begin forwarded message: From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>> Subject: Re: [council] Message from Policy & Implementation WG Date: March 16, 2014 at 4:03:40 PM GMT+1 To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, "gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>" <gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>>, ispcp@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ispcp@xxxxxxxxx> hi all, these look great. i marked them up with the questions that popped out at me as i read them. i was doing this mostly as notes to myself and intended to just bring these up on Saturday. but i've attached them to this reply in case time grows tight in Singapore. these are my reactions as an individual and have not been reviewed by the ISPCP. great start! mikey On Mar 14, 2014, at 2:30 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: Dear All, On behalf of the Policy & Implementation Working Group I would like to share with you the working definitions and working principles (under final review) that the WG has developed to facilitate its deliberations on the charter questions. You are encouraged to share these with your respective groups and share any feedback you may have with the WG either during its update to the GNSO in Singapore or as part of its F2F meeting which has been scheduled for Wednesday 26 March from 15.30 - 17.00 SGT in room Sophia, please see http://singapore49.icann.org/en/schedule/wed-policy-implementation. Best regards, Marika <PI Working Principles For Review in Singapore.doc><PI Proposed Working Definitions - 19 February 2014.doc> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com/>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) Attachment:
PI Proposed Working Definitions - 19 February 2014 - Mikey with Gomes responses.doc Attachment:
PI Working Principles For Review in Singapore - Mikey with Gomes responses.doc
|