RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: Fwd: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Avri.  Does anyone in the WG object to Avri's two suggested edits?  They 
look fine to me.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:09 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: Fwd: Re: For your review - updated PI 
working principles

Hi,

I made edits as requested after the meeting, but sent them off to the wrong 
address so they got lost.  Just posting them to the group as follow-up for 
future consideration.

avri



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:00:21 -0400
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>,  "Gomes, Chuck" 
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> I just checked with Chuck and he didn't receive anything either.

i see i messed up the addressing.  i thought i was sending it to the whole 
list, because i thought they had been copied in to the whole exchange.

oh, well, got side tracked yesterday but thought i had met the 17 utc deadline 
today.

bummer.

my fault.

avri



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:57:19 -0400
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
To: gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>

(removed CCs since i think all are on the list)

Hi,

In general the issues looked fine but the wording was still awkward.
Made a recommended change in the attached.

avri


On 13-Mar-14 08:48, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> I made a few edits and inserted some comments in the attached version.
>
> Chuck
>
> *From:*owner-gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Marika 
> Konings
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:23 AM
> *To:* Avri Doria; Shatan, Gregory S.; Amr Elsadr
> *Cc:* gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-chairs] For your review - updated PI 
> working principles
>
> Avri, Greg, Amr, Chuck,
>
> Following yesterday's meeting, I took a stab at integrating your 
> suggested language (taking advantage of the time difference ;-).
>
> Amr, please take a look at the new overarching principle on page 1 - 
> I'm not sure whether it really fits there and have made a suggestion 
> for where it may go, but let me know if the proposed addition conveys 
> your suggestion and where you think it should go. In relation to the 
> second proposed principle, I think it is actually already covered in 
> the new D1-c and D2-b and c, so I'm not sure whether a separate 
> principle is still needed?
>
> Avri, Greg, I've incorporated your suggested language, but made some 
> updates to the language suggested by Avri to reflect the difference 
> between making administrative changes to the policy recommendations 
> and the implementation plan. Please feel free to revise as you deem 
> appropriate.
>
> Chuck, we still have the bracketed language in B-4. Maybe I missed it 
> on the call yesterday, but did we discuss/agree whether it should stay 
> or go, or do we leave it bracketed for now?
>
> In order to get this out to the full WG for review, can I please ask 
> you to send your feedback today (Thursday 13 March) so I can get it 
> out to the full WG tomorrow morning my time?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Marika
>