[gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: Fwd: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles
Hi,I made edits as requested after the meeting, but sent them off to the wrong address so they got lost. Just posting them to the group as follow-up for future consideration. avri -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Fwd: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:00:21 -0400 From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I just checked with Chuck and he didn't receive anything either. i see i messed up the addressing. i thought i was sending it to the whole list, because i thought they had been copied in to the whole exchange. oh, well, got side tracked yesterday but thought i had met the 17 utc deadline today. bummer. my fault. avri -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:57:19 -0400 From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> To: gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx> (removed CCs since i think all are on the list) Hi, In general the issues looked fine but the wording was still awkward. Made a recommended change in the attached. avri On 13-Mar-14 08:48, Gomes, Chuck wrote: I made a few edits and inserted some comments in the attached version. Chuck *From:*owner-gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings *Sent:* Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:23 AM *To:* Avri Doria; Shatan, Gregory S.; Amr Elsadr *Cc:* gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-chairs] For your review - updated PI working principles Avri, Greg, Amr, Chuck, Following yesterday's meeting, I took a stab at integrating your suggested language (taking advantage of the time difference ;-). Amr, please take a look at the new overarching principle on page 1 – I'm not sure whether it really fits there and have made a suggestion for where it may go, but let me know if the proposed addition conveys your suggestion and where you think it should go. In relation to the second proposed principle, I think it is actually already covered in the new D1-c and D2-b and c, so I'm not sure whether a separate principle is still needed? Avri, Greg, I've incorporated your suggested language, but made some updates to the language suggested by Avri to reflect the difference between making administrative changes to the policy recommendations and the implementation plan. Please feel free to revise as you deem appropriate. Chuck, we still have the bracketed language in B-4. Maybe I missed it on the call yesterday, but did we discuss/agree whether it should stay or go, or do we leave it bracketed for now? In order to get this out to the full WG for review, can I please ask you to send your feedback today (Thursday 13 March) so I can get it out to the full WG tomorrow morning my time? Thanks! Marika Attachment:
PI Working Principles Updated 12 March 2014 with Gomes input+ad.doc
|