RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: Fwd: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed. Happy to accept changes... Thanks Avri
On Mar 17, 2014 5:56 AM, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Thanks Avri.  Does anyone in the WG object to Avri's two suggested edits?
>  They look fine to me.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:09 AM
> To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Fwd: Fwd: Re: For your review - updated PI
> working principles
>
> Hi,
>
> I made edits as requested after the meeting, but sent them off to the
> wrong address so they got lost.  Just posting them to the group as
> follow-up for future consideration.
>
> avri
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Fwd: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:00:21 -0400
> From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>,  "Gomes, Chuck"
> <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > I just checked with Chuck and he didn't receive anything either.
>
> i see i messed up the addressing.  i thought i was sending it to the whole
> list, because i thought they had been copied in to the whole exchange.
>
> oh, well, got side tracked yesterday but thought i had met the 17 utc
> deadline today.
>
> bummer.
>
> my fault.
>
> avri
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: For your review - updated PI working principles
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:57:19 -0400
> From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> To: gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> (removed CCs since i think all are on the list)
>
> Hi,
>
> In general the issues looked fine but the wording was still awkward.
> Made a recommended change in the attached.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 13-Mar-14 08:48, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > I made a few edits and inserted some comments in the attached version.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > *From:*owner-gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Marika
> > Konings
> > *Sent:* Thursday, March 13, 2014 6:23 AM
> > *To:* Avri Doria; Shatan, Gregory S.; Amr Elsadr
> > *Cc:* gnso-policyimpl-chairs@xxxxxxxxx
> > *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-chairs] For your review - updated PI
> > working principles
> >
> > Avri, Greg, Amr, Chuck,
> >
> > Following yesterday's meeting, I took a stab at integrating your
> > suggested language (taking advantage of the time difference ;-).
> >
> > Amr, please take a look at the new overarching principle on page 1 -
> > I'm not sure whether it really fits there and have made a suggestion
> > for where it may go, but let me know if the proposed addition conveys
> > your suggestion and where you think it should go. In relation to the
> > second proposed principle, I think it is actually already covered in
> > the new D1-c and D2-b and c, so I'm not sure whether a separate
> > principle is still needed?
> >
> > Avri, Greg, I've incorporated your suggested language, but made some
> > updates to the language suggested by Avri to reflect the difference
> > between making administrative changes to the policy recommendations
> > and the implementation plan. Please feel free to revise as you deem
> appropriate.
> >
> > Chuck, we still have the bracketed language in B-4. Maybe I missed it
> > on the call yesterday, but did we discuss/agree whether it should stay
> > or go, or do we leave it bracketed for now?
> >
> > In order to get this out to the full WG for review, can I please ask
> > you to send your feedback today (Thursday 13 March) so I can get it
> > out to the full WG tomorrow morning my time?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Marika
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>