[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For your review - Deliverable I - A - Review Chart

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I inserted some text in green font regarding strong & weak point for the
RC/IOC and IGO columns.

 

Chuck

 

From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 3:00 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - Deliverable I - A - Review
Chart

 

Dear All,

 

As discussed during Wednesday's meeting, please find attached a chart
outlining the different initiatives that were flagged for further review as
examples of approaches the GNSO has used to date to develop policy / advice
outside of the PDP. As you recall, several of you volunteered to review
these efforts in further detail (see list below). Of course, others are more
than welcome to add their perspectives as well. As you review, please mark
your edits in a different colour so it will be easier for everyone to see
what has been changed / added. We would especially like to encourage you to
focus on the strong / weak points section which we have left blank for now.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

*       STI: Alan
*       RC-IOC DT: Alan, Chuck, Greg
*       GNSO Council responses to Board requests concerning IGO protections:
Alan, Chuck, Greg
*       Board request for GNSO to consider defensive registrations: 
*       GNSO feedback on Whois RT Final Report:  
*       Correspondence on TMCH strawman proposal: Avri
*       TMCH Proposal Development: Alan, Avri, Greg
*       Response to Board request on closed generics: Greg, Anne
*       Correspondence on string  similarity: 
*       Comments on ATRT2 recommendations: 
*       Board request concerning .brand/spec 13: 
*       IRT (pre-STI): Alan

Attachment: Copy of PIWG - Deliverable I-A Review Chart - 9 May 2014 Gomes input.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature