Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For your review - Deliverable I - A - Review Chart
And a few comment by me. Alan At 12/05/2014 08:11 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote: I inserted some text in green font regarding strong & weak point for the RC/IOC and IGO columns.ChuckFrom: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika KoningsSent: Friday, May 09, 2014 3:00 AM To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxxSubject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For your review - Deliverable I - A - Review ChartDear All,As discussed during Wednesday's meeting, please find attached a chart outlining the different initiatives that were flagged for further review as examples of approaches the GNSO has used to date to develop policy / advice outside of the PDP. As you recall, several of you volunteered to review these efforts in further detail (see list below). Of course, others are more than welcome to add their perspectives as well. As you review, please mark your edits in a different colour so it will be easier for everyone to see what has been changed / added. We would especially like to encourage you to focus on the strong / weak points section which we have left blank for now.Best regards, Marika * STI: Alan * RC-IOC DT: Alan, Chuck, Greg* GNSO Council responses to Board requests concerning IGO protections: Alan, Chuck, Greg* Board request for GNSO to consider defensive registrations: * GNSO feedback on Whois RT Final Report: * Correspondence on TMCH strawman proposal: Avri * TMCH Proposal Development: Alan, Avri, Greg * Response to Board request on closed generics: Greg, Anne * Correspondence on string similarity: * Comments on ATRT2 recommendations: * Board request concerning .brand/spec 13: * IRT (pre-STI): Alan Attachment:
Copy of PIWG - Deliverable I-A Review Chart - 9 May 2014 Gomes Greenberg.xls
|