Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Agenda and draft documents for WG call on 13 August 2014

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Wolf-Ulrich,

In line with the existing PDP, our suggestion would be that there are only
minimum timelines, not maximum as we have learned from past experiences that
those do not really work. If there would be time restrictions due to
external deadlines or sense of urgency, the Council could set those as part
of the scope setting phase. Normally it will depend on the complexity of the
issue, outreach / discussion needed, how quick or slow a certain process may
run, but the idea would be to leave as much flexibility as possible so that
it can go as fast or as slow as is needed for the particular issue under
consideration.

Best regards,

Marika

From:  "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Wednesday 13 August 2014 16:41
To:  Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:  Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx"
<gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Agenda and draft documents for WG call on
13 August 2014

I mean the first. If possible put one line under each chart showing the
estimated duration of the relevant process parts.

Regards
Wolf-Ulrich

Sent from my personal phone

Am 13.08.2014 um 16:05 schrieb "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Wolf,
>  
> What kind of timelines?  Could you elaborate a little more.  Timelines for how
> long such processes would take?  Or timelines for developing the processes?
> Or something different?
>  
> Chuck
>  
> 
> From:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of WUKnoben
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 2:05 AM
> To: Mary Wong; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Agenda and draft documents for WG call on 13
> August 2014
>  
> 
> Thanks for all the input documents!
> 
>  
> 
> Would it be possible to discuss (and insert as information to the SO/ACs)
> potential timelines along these processes (PGP/PIP)?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
>  
> 
> From:Mary Wong <mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 12:29 AM
> 
> To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Agenda and draft documents for WG call on 13
> August 2014
> 
>  
> 
> Dear WG members,
> 
>  
> 
> Here is the proposed agenda for the WG call on Wednesday 13 August:
> 1. Roll Call/Updates to SOI
> 2. Finalize proposed PGP/PIP flow chart (circulated on 11 August)
> 3. Complete discussion on Deliverable I (sub-questions E(a), E(b) and E(c))
> 4. Update on SO/AC/SG/C input received in relation to Deliverable I (reports
> from Cheryl, Olevie, Michael)
> 5. [if time permits] Commence discussions on Deliverable II (attached)
> In addition, a suggested draft email that can be sent to SG/C chairs
> soliciting their groups¹ feedback on the proposed GNSO Processes Flowcharts is
> attached for your review. As you¹ll recall from the call last week, it was
> agreed that a consistent approach and thus a uniform email should be sent on
> this topic.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks and cheers
> 
> Mary
> 
>  
> 
> Mary Wong
> 
> Senior Policy Director
> 
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> 
> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
> 
>  
> 
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature