<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Possible meeting onflict
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Possible meeting onflict
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:24:45 -0500
Agree that changing it is not an option. If we get too many regrets, we always
have the option to cancel.
I will miss the following meeting as well due to the IANA Stewardship CWG
meeting in Frankfurt.
--
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.
On November 5, 2014 5:42:32 PM EST, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Thanks for pointing this out Alan. I regret the conflict but I am
>afraid if we try to change it we will just create other conflicts
>because WG members have had this on their calendar for a long time.
>
>Chuck
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
>Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 4:17 PM
>To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Possible meeting onflict
>
>
>I should have noticed this during the call, but next week's meeting
>overlaps exactly with the IANA Transition ICG Call.
>
>That is a conflict for me and I am pretty sure, others.
>
>Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|