<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] On the Role of a WG Chair vs. Council Liaison
- To: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] On the Role of a WG Chair vs. Council Liaison
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:56:52 -0500
Amr,
The WG guidelines have served the GNSO well, as well as other groups
such as te ALAC which has taken them and loosely adapted them for
their own purposes, making changes as appropriate, but wouthout
formally documenting them. The GNSO has done the same, and the IRT is
one such example where the general tone and intent of the guidelines
is used, even when all the words do not exactly fit.
Alan
At 26/11/2014 04:37 PM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
Hi J. Scott and all,
Looking over the GNSO Working Group Guidelines, specifically
sections 2.1.4.2, 2.2.1 and 2.2.4, it seems to me that the function
described in section V(E) of the IRT Operating Principles is a lot
more consistent with what a working group chair should be doing, and
not what a council liaison's role is.
Apart from a liaison's duty to facilitate dialogue between a working
group and the council, the liaison is expected to assist "the Chair
as required with his/her knowledge of WG processes and practices;
taking back to the CO (chartering organisation) any questions or
queries the WG might have in relation to its charter and mission;
and, assisting or intervening when the WG faces challenges or
problems." This duty is, however, done under the assumption that
there is a working group chair present who is actually responsible
for management of the process (not the council liaison), including
presiding over discussions and holding consensus calls.
Like I said on the call, I am not adamantly against the IRT council
liaison performing the tasks outlined in this IRT operating
principle, but would certainly feel that a member of the IRT
selected by the IRT members would be more suitable. It was not my
intent to belabour this opinion, but since the GNSO working group
guidelines are being used as a reference for this decision, then I
think that would support the selection of an IRT member rather than
a council liaison serving in this capacity.
Thanks.
Amr
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|