[gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: PI Initial Report - updated draft for today's meeting

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Marika.  As you can probably tell, I have not looked at her version yet. 
 I am heavily involved in IANA CWG work that is very time sensitive, but I will 
try to do that before our call.

Chuck

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 9:43 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PI Initial Report - updated draft for today's meeting

Chuck, Anne used this version to add her edits / comments. All comments and 
edits received to date should be included in the version that Anne circulated 
and which I've attached here again for your convenience.

Best regards,

Marika

From: <Gomes>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday 7 January 2015 15:38
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
"gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: PI Initial Report - updated draft for today's meeting

Thank you very much Marika.  Is it possible to add Anne's input to this?

Chuck

From: 
owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 5:40 AM
To: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] PI Initial Report - updated draft for today's 
meeting

Dear All,

To date, I've received comments from Chuck and some of my colleagues that I've 
integrated in the attached version. Please use this version if you have any 
further edits / comments. Note, that I've already fixed some of the issues 
identified as well as updated Annex F as I had used an outdated version.

To facilitate the WG's review later today, I've taken the liberty to highlight 
those comments / edits in yellow that may benefit from further WG 
consideration. All other edits appear to be clarifications / corrections that 
probably do not warrant further discussion (if you think otherwise, please flag 
any other items that you think need WG consideration).

Best regards,

Marika