RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] A new twist to Implementation Review Teams

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes Chuck I think this should be an observation/ note in the report,
perhaps also picking up on the need for the clearly required 'in-service'
education for all parties, including GDD staff, engaged...
On 06/02/2015 6:39 am, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Good observation Alan.  Do you think that we should consider adding
> something to the report in this regard?  I think your observation would
> make a good comment regarding the implementation framework in the report.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 9:33 PM
> To: GNSO-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] A new twist to Implementation Review Teams
>
> We have had a lot of discussion about
> Implementation Review Teams and particular who leads them. The consensus
> was that they are led by the GDD person responsible for the implementation
> project. The appended thread demonstrates a little problem that arose in
> the ThickWhois IRT. GNSO Policy Staff (and the GNSO Vice-chair charged with
> meeting scheduling) spend an inordinate amount of time finding slots for
> meetings that minimize overlaps. I am guessing that the Thickwhois IRT was
> scheduled by GDD without that level of consultation and resulted with the
> IRT meeting overlapping with the GNSO Wrap-up.
>
> Nothing particularly onerous but it demonstrates yet another way aspect of
> the need for coordination following the transfer of responsibility when the
> GNSO hands the project over to the GDD.
>
> Alan
>
>
> >From: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux@xxxxxxxxx>
> >To: "gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@xxxxxxxxx"
> ><gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:21:27 +0000
> >Subject: Re: [Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt] "thick" WHOIS IRT F2F in
> >Singapore
> >
> >
> >Dear colleagues,
> >
> >Unfortunately, we will not able to move the meeting without potentially
> >creating new conflicts, including for the Implementation Project Team
> >and other supporting staff. We apologize for this inconvenience.
> >
> >I am sure you can appreciate the complexity of the planning endeavor
> >and the care that was given to avoid conflicts as much as possible.
> >
> >Here is how I propose we mitigate the impact of the conflicts that were
> >reported:
> >- we will discuss the update on the legal review in the first half hour
> >of the meeting so that it does not conflict with the GNSO Wrap-up
> >Meeting
> >- we will provide recordings and transcripts
> >- and we will provide an opportunity for all to contribute to the
> >discussion in the week after the meeting.
> >
> >The agenda of our meeting as well as material for your consideration
> >will follow.
> >
> >Thank you for your comprehension and participation.
> >--
> >Fabien Betremieux
> >Sr. Registry Services & Engagement Manager Global Domains Division,
> >ICANN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 1/28/15, 10:18 PM, "Fabien Betremieux" <fabien.betremieux@xxxxxxxxx>
> >wrote:
> >
> > >Dear Colleagues,
> > >
> > >Thank you Amr for raising this concern.
> > >
> > >I am interested to know if this is creating a conflict for anybody
> > >else in the IRT so that we can look into potential mitigations
> strategies.
> > >
> > >Moving the session may be very difficult because as it is already an
> > >outcome of a complex multi-variable optimization exercise, but we
> > >could also consider other solutions, including for example arranging
> > >the agenda so that the affected participants can take part in what is
> > >the most important to them and they can possibly catch up on the
> > >recording later for the rest.
> > >
> > >Please let me know as soon as possible, and by the end of this week
> > >at the latest.
> > >
> > >Thanks in advance
> > >
> > >--
> > >Fabien Betremieux
> > >Sr. Registry Services & Engagement Manager Global Domains Division,
> > >ICANN
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On 1/28/15, 4:39 PM, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>I just noticed that the IRT易s meeting in Singapore partly overlaps
> > >>with the GNSO wrap up meeting. That is unfortunate.
> > >>
> > >>Thanks.
> > >>
> > >>Amr
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
> > >>Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@xxxxxxxxx
> > >>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt mailing list
> >Gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt@xxxxxxxxx
> >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-impl-thickwhois-rt
>
>