<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
- From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:20:01 +0100
Hi,
I wasn’t sure if the document submission using Adobe EchoSign worked or not, so
I also filled in the online survey. In any case the NCSG response has been
submitted.
I think it is noteworthy to mention that there was significant interest in the
NCSG on the work done by this working group. We held a webinar last week to
discuss the initial report and recommendations, as well as the NCSG response.
Thanks.
Amr
On Mar 17, 2015, at 8:36 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks Greg.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:36 PM
> To: J. Scott Evans
> Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Amr Elsadr; Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed
> Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
>
> IPC input has now been submitted by Anne Aikman-Scalese.
>
> GReg
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> +1
>
> Sent from myMail for iOS
>
>
> Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 7:35 AM -0700 from Gomes, Chuck
> <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Glad to hear that Amr.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:29 AM
> To: Marika Konings
> Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> The NCSG input is forthcoming, hopefully within the next few hours.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Amr
>
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> In preparation for tomorrow’s meeting, please note that to date three
> submissions (RySG, Brand Registry Group and BC) have been received in
> response to the public comment forum
> (seehttp://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/).
> Furthermore, 11 survey responses have been received – however, only three of
> these are considered complete as they responded to all the questions of the
> survey. Based on the input received to date, staff has prepared the attached
> public comment review tool. We will of course update this accordingly if
> other submissions are received prior to the deadline (today 23:59 UTC).
>
>
>
> The proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting is as follows:
>
> Roll Call / SOI
> Review work plan (see latest version attached)
> Commence review of public comments (see public comment review tool attached)
> Next steps / confirm next meeting
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
> <PI WG Work Plan - updated 2 October 2014.doc><Public comment review tool -
> PI Initial Report - 17 March 2015.doc>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|