RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That interest is great to hear Amr.

Chuck

From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:20 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Greg Shatan; J. Scott Evans; Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & 
materials PI WG meeting

Hi,

I wasn't sure if the document submission using Adobe EchoSign worked or not, so 
I also filled in the online survey. In any case the NCSG response has been 
submitted.

I think it is noteworthy to mention that there was significant interest in the 
NCSG on the work done by this working group. We held a webinar last week to 
discuss the initial report and recommendations, as well as the NCSG response.

Thanks.

Amr

On Mar 17, 2015, at 8:36 PM, Gomes, Chuck 
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


Thanks Greg.

Chuck

From: Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:36 PM
To: J. Scott Evans
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Amr Elsadr; Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda 
& materials PI WG meeting

IPC input has now been submitted by Anne Aikman-Scalese.

GReg

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, J. Scott Evans 
<jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

+1

Sent from myMail for iOS


Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 7:35 AM -0700 from Gomes, Chuck 
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>:


Glad to hear that Amr.



Chuck



From: 
owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:29 AM
To: Marika Konings
Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting



Hi,



The NCSG input is forthcoming, hopefully within the next few hours.



Thanks.



Amr



On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Marika Konings 
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<https://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3amarika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
 wrote:



Dear All,



In preparation for tomorrow's meeting, please note that to date three 
submissions (RySG, Brand Registry Group and BC) have been received in response 
to the public comment forum 
(seehttp://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/).
 Furthermore, 11 survey responses have been received - however, only three of 
these are considered complete as they responded to all the questions of the 
survey. Based on the input received to date, staff has prepared the attached 
public comment review tool. We will of course update this accordingly if other 
submissions are received prior to the deadline (today 23:59 UTC).



The proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting is as follows:

  1.  Roll Call / SOI
  2.  Review work plan (see latest version attached)
  3.  Commence review of public comments (see public comment review tool 
attached)
  4.  Next steps / confirm next meeting

Best regards,



Marika

<PI WG Work Plan - updated 2 October 2014.doc><Public comment review tool - PI 
Initial Report - 17 March 2015.doc>