<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
- From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:43:47 -0700
I agree. Thanks for letting us know.
j. scott evans - associate general counsel - adobe - 408.536.5336 -
jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx
From: cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx; jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx; marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx;
gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda &
materials PI WG meeting
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:16:49 +0000
That interest is great to hear Amr.
Chuck
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 4:20 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Greg Shatan; J. Scott Evans; Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda &
materials PI WG meeting
Hi,
I wasn’t sure if the document submission using Adobe EchoSign worked or not, so
I also filled in the online survey. In any case the NCSG response has been
submitted.
I think it is noteworthy to mention that there was significant interest in the
NCSG on the work done by this working group. We held a webinar last week to
discuss the initial report and recommendations, as well as the NCSG response.
Thanks.
Amr
On Mar 17, 2015, at 8:36 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Greg.
Chuck
From: Greg
Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:36 PM
To: J. Scott Evans
Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Amr Elsadr; Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda
& materials PI WG meeting
IPC input has now been submitted by Anne Aikman-Scalese.
GReg
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
+1
Sent from myMail for iOS
Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 7:35 AM -0700 from Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Glad to hear that Amr.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:29 AM
To: Marika Konings
Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
Hi,
The NCSG input is forthcoming, hopefully within the next few hours.
Thanks.
Amr
On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear All,
In preparation for tomorrow’s meeting, please note that to date three
submissions (RySG, Brand Registry Group and BC) have been received in response
to the public comment forum
(seehttp://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/).
Furthermore, 11 survey responses have been received – however, only three of
these are considered complete as they responded to all the questions of the
survey. Based on the input received to date, staff has prepared the attached
public comment review tool.
We will of course update this accordingly if other submissions are received
prior to the deadline (today 23:59 UTC).
The proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting is as follows:
Roll Call / SOIReview work plan (see latest version attached)Commence review of
public comments (see public comment review tool attached)Next steps / confirm
next meeting
Best regards,
Marika
<PI WG Work Plan - updated 2 October 2014.doc><Public comment review tool - PI
Initial Report - 17 March 2015.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|