<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
- To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>, "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:31:28 +0000
Greg, has the input been submitted to the survey or the public comment forum? I
don't see it in the survey tool nor the public comment forum, but if it was
submitted in the latter there may be some delay in it appearing.
Best regards,
Marika
From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday 17 March 2015 20:36
To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>, Amr Elsadr
<aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>>, Marika Konings
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda
& materials PI WG meeting
IPC input has now been submitted by Anne Aikman-Scalese.
GReg
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, J. Scott Evans
<jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
+1
Sent from myMail for iOS
Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 7:35 AM -0700 from Gomes, Chuck
<cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>:
Glad to hear that Amr.
Chuck
From:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>]
On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:29 AM
To: Marika Konings
Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
Hi,
The NCSG input is forthcoming, hopefully within the next few hours.
Thanks.
Amr
On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Marika Konings
<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<https://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3amarika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:
Dear All,
In preparation for tomorrow's meeting, please note that to date three
submissions (RySG, Brand Registry Group and BC) have been received in response
to the public comment forum (see
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/).
Furthermore, 11 survey responses have been received - however, only three of
these are considered complete as they responded to all the questions of the
survey. Based on the input received to date, staff has prepared the attached
public comment review tool. We will of course update this accordingly if other
submissions are received prior to the deadline (today 23:59 UTC).
The proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting is as follows:
1. Roll Call / SOI
2. Review work plan (see latest version attached)
3. Commence review of public comments (see public comment review tool
attached)
4. Next steps / confirm next meeting
Best regards,
Marika
<PI WG Work Plan - updated 2 October 2014.doc><Public comment review tool - PI
Initial Report - 17 March 2015.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|