Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting

[Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Marika, because my email to the public comments forum looks like 
gibberish!! I wouldn’t be surprised if I am banned from submitting comments for 
life!! What’s up with using EchoSign anyway!? :)

Thanks again.

Amr

On Mar 17, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Amr, I can confirm that the NCSG survey responses have been received. I also 
> saw that the ISPCP has submitted their responses. I’ll update the public 
> comment review tool prior to our meeting tomorrow.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday 17 March 2015 21:20
> To: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>, "J. Scott Evans" 
> <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, 
> "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & 
> materials PI WG meeting
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I wasn’t sure if the document submission using Adobe EchoSign worked or not, 
> so I also filled in the online survey. In any case the NCSG response has been 
> submitted.
> 
> I think it is noteworthy to mention that there was significant interest in 
> the NCSG on the work done by this working group. We held a webinar last week 
> to discuss the initial report and recommendations, as well as the NCSG 
> response.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Amr
> 
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 8:36 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks Greg.
>>  
>> Chuck
>>  
>> From: Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:36 PM
>> To: J. Scott Evans
>> Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Amr Elsadr; Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed 
>> Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
>>  
>> IPC input has now been submitted by Anne Aikman-Scalese.
>>  
>> GReg
>>  
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
>> wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> Sent from myMail for iOS
>> 
>> 
>> Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 7:35 AM -0700 from Gomes, Chuck 
>> <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>  
>>> Glad to hear that Amr.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Chuck
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:29 AM
>>> To: Marika Konings
>>> Cc: gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> The NCSG input is forthcoming, hopefully within the next few hours.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Amr
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> In preparation for tomorrow’s meeting, please note that to date three 
>>> submissions (RySG, Brand Registry Group and BC) have been received in 
>>> response to the public comment forum 
>>> (seehttp://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/).
>>>  Furthermore, 11 survey responses have been received – however, only three 
>>> of these are considered complete as they responded to all the questions of 
>>> the survey. Based on the input received to date, staff has prepared the 
>>> attached public comment review tool. We will of course update this 
>>> accordingly if other submissions are received prior to the deadline (today 
>>> 23:59 UTC). 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> The proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting is as follows:
>>> 
>>> Roll Call / SOI
>>> Review work plan (see latest version attached)
>>> Commence review of public comments (see public comment review tool attached)
>>> Next steps / confirm next meeting
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Marika
>>> 
>>> <PI WG Work Plan - updated 2 October 2014.doc><Public comment review tool - 
>>> PI Initial Report - 17 March 2015.doc>
>>> 
>