<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
- To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:08:29 -0400
Marika,
The IPC comment was submitted both ways, I am told. I received an email
almost simultaneously with yours that Anne received a confirmation.
Greg
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Greg, has the input been submitted to the survey or the public comment
> forum? I don’t see it in the survey tool nor the public comment forum, but
> if it was submitted in the latter there may be some delay in it appearing.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday 17 March 2015 20:36
> To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx"
> <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed
> Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
>
> IPC input has now been submitted by Anne Aikman-Scalese.
>
> GReg
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Sent from myMail for iOS
>>
>>
>> Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 7:35 AM -0700 from Gomes, Chuck <
>> cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Glad to hear that Amr.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>> owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Amr Elsadr
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:29 AM
>> *To:* Marika Konings
>> *Cc:* gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG
>> meeting
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> The NCSG input is forthcoming, hopefully within the next few hours.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> Amr
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx
>> <https://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3amarika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>>
>> In preparation for tomorrow’s meeting, please note that to date three
>> submissions (RySG, Brand Registry Group and BC) have been received in
>> response to the public comment forum (see
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/).
>> Furthermore, 11 survey responses have been received – however, only three
>> of these are considered complete as they responded to all the questions of
>> the survey. Based on the input received to date, staff has prepared the
>> attached public comment review tool. We will of course update this
>> accordingly if other submissions are received prior to the deadline (today
>> 23:59 UTC).
>>
>>
>>
>> The proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting is as follows:
>>
>> 1. Roll Call / SOI
>> 2. Review work plan (see latest version attached)
>> 3. Commence review of public comments (see public comment review tool
>> attached)
>> 4. Next steps / confirm next meeting
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Marika
>>
>> <PI WG Work Plan - updated 2 October 2014.doc><Public comment review tool
>> - PI Initial Report - 17 March 2015.doc>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|