Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

ALAC has submitted a text comment. We will also 
be doing a survey, but it will be another day or so.  Alan
At 17/03/2015 04:22 PM, Marika Konings wrote:
> Amr, I can confirm that the NCSG survey 
> responses have been received. I also saw that 
> the ISPCP has submitted their responses. I’ll 
> update the public comment review tool prior to our meeting tomorrow.
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> From: Amr Elsadr <<mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday 17 March 2015 21:20
> To: Chuck Gomes <<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Shatan 
> <<mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>, 
> "J. Scott Evans" 
> <<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>, 
> Marika Konings 
> <<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, 
> "<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" 
> <<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] 
> [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
> Hi,
>
> I wasn’t sure if the document submission using 
> Adobe EchoSign worked or not, so I also filled 
> in the online survey. In any case the NCSG response has been submitted.
> I think it is noteworthy to mention that there 
> was significant interest in the NCSG on the work 
> done by this working group. We held a webinar 
> last week to discuss the initial report and 
> recommendations, as well as the NCSG response.
> Thanks.
>
> Amr
>
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 8:36 PM, Gomes, Chuck 
> <<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks Greg.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > From: Greg Shatan 
> > [<mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>mailto:gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:36 PM
> > To: J. Scott Evans
> > Cc: Gomes, Chuck; Amr Elsadr; Marika Konings; gnso-policyimpl-wg
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: 
> > [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
> > IPC input has now been submitted by Anne Aikman-Scalese.
> >
> > GReg
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, J. Scott 
> > Evans <<mailto:jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Sent from myMail for iOS
> >
> >
> > Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 7:35 AM -0700 from 
> > Gomes, Chuck <<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > Glad to hear that Amr.
> >
> >
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> >
> > From: 
> > <mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> > [mailto:<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] 
> > On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:29 AM
> > To: Marika Konings
> > Cc: <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > The NCSG input is forthcoming, hopefully within the next few hours.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Amr
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Marika Konings 
> > <<https://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3amarika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> >
> >
> > In preparation for tomorrow’s meeting, please 
> > note that to date three submissions (RySG, 
> > Brand Registry Group and BC) have been received 
> > in response to the public comment forum 
> > (see<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15>http<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15>://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/). 
> > Furthermore, 11 survey responses have been 
> > received – however, only three of these are 
> > considered complete as they responded to all 
> > the questions of the survey. Based on the input 
> > received to date, staff has prepared the 
> > attached public comment review tool. We will of 
> > course update this accordingly if other 
> > submissions are received prior to the deadline (today 23:59 UTC).
> >
> >
> > The proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting is as follows:
> > Roll Call / SOI
> > Review work plan (see latest version attached)
> > Commence review of public comments (see public comment review tool attached)
> > Next steps / confirm next meeting
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Marika
> >
> > <PI WG Work Plan - updated 2 October 
> > 2014.doc><Public comment review tool - PI Initial Report - 17 March 2015.doc>