ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-policyimpl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting

  • To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
  • From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:54:49 -0400

Anne,

Can you send Marika the IPC comment directly so that she can put it in the
public comment review tool?  There seems to be some delay in having it turn
up.

Thanks!

Greg

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>  I don’t see it in the public comment forum nor the survey tool, but
> maybe there is some delay in it appearing. I’ll keep on checking, but in
> the meantime, maybe you can send it to me directly so at least I can
> include it in the public comment review tool?
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Marika
>
>   From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday 17 March 2015 22:08
> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Chuck Gomes <
> cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "
> gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed
> Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
>
>   Marika,
>
>  The IPC comment was submitted both ways, I am told.  I received an email
> almost simultaneously with yours that Anne received a confirmation.
>
>  Greg
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>  Greg, has the input been submitted to the survey or the public comment
>> forum? I don’t see it in the survey tool nor the public comment forum, but
>> if it was submitted in the latter there may be some delay in it appearing.
>>
>>  Best regards,
>>
>>  Marika
>>
>>   From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tuesday 17 March 2015 20:36
>> To: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx"
>> <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed
>> Agenda & materials PI WG meeting
>>
>>   IPC input has now been submitted by Anne Aikman-Scalese.
>>
>>  GReg
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:41 AM, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>    +1
>>>
>>> Sent from myMail for iOS
>>>
>>>
>>> Tuesday, March 17, 2015, 7:35 AM -0700 from Gomes, Chuck <
>>> cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>
>>>    Glad to hear that Amr.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:*owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Amr Elsadr
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:29 AM
>>> *To:* Marika Konings
>>> *Cc:* gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Proposed Agenda & materials PI WG
>>> meeting
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The NCSG input is forthcoming, hopefully within the next few hours.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Amr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx
>>> <https://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3amarika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Dear All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In preparation for tomorrow’s meeting, please note that to date three
>>> submissions (RySG, Brand Registry Group and BC) have been received in
>>> response to the public comment forum (see
>>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-policy-implementation-initial-19jan15/).
>>> Furthermore, 11 survey responses have been received – however, only three
>>> of these are considered complete as they responded to all the questions of
>>> the survey. Based on the input received to date, staff has prepared the
>>> attached public comment review tool. We will of course update this
>>> accordingly if other submissions are received prior to the deadline (today
>>> 23:59 UTC).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting is as follows:
>>>
>>>    1. Roll Call / SOI
>>>    2. Review work plan (see latest version attached)
>>>    3. Commence review of public comments (see public comment review
>>>    tool attached)
>>>    4. Next steps / confirm next meeting
>>>
>>>  Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marika
>>>
>>> <PI WG Work Plan - updated 2 October 2014.doc><Public comment review
>>> tool - PI Initial Report - 17 March 2015.doc>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy