<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Latest version of the comment review document
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Latest version of the comment review document
- From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:30:01 +0200
Hi,
On Mar 28, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[SNIP]
> Marika & I talked briefly in Istanbul. We have not made as much progress on
> going through the public comments as we had hoped and may be in jeopardy of
> missing our target dates. She suggested that we could get some volunteers
> (or small groups of volunteers) to draft possible responses for subsets of
> the items and then present those to the full WG. Of course we would need
> volunteers for that to work. How many of you would be willing to do this?
> In the cases of the comments from the ALAC, IPC and NCSG, we would need to
> pair WG members from those respective groups with some who are not from those
> groups. Please respond to this email if you are willing to contribute in this
> way. Another option could be to lengthen our calls from 60 minutes to 90
> minutes; please respond if you could or could not do that.
I would be willing to work on a sub-group, but would prefer the second option
of 90 minute calls. Just worried about duplicating work, which may not
necessarily help in sticking to the desired timeline.
Thanks.
Amr
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|