[gnso-policyimpl-wg] Re[2]: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] Latest version of the comment review document

[J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Amr.

Sent from myMail for iOS


Monday, March 30, 2015, 9:30 AM -0700 from Amr Elsadr  <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>Hi,
>On Mar 28, 2015, at 9:40 PM, Gomes, Chuck < cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
>
>[SNIP]
>>Marika & I talked briefly in Istanbul.  We have not made as much progress on 
>>going through the public comments as we had hoped and may be in jeopardy of 
>>missing our target dates.  She suggested that we could get some volunteers 
>>(or small groups of volunteers) to draft possible responses for subsets of 
>>the items and then present those to the full WG.  Of course we would need 
>>volunteers for that to work.  How many of you would be willing to do this?  
>>In the cases of the comments from the ALAC, IPC and NCSG, we would need to 
>>pair WG members from those respective groups with some who are not from those 
>>groups. Please respond to this email if you are willing to contribute in this 
>>way.  Another option could be to lengthen our calls from 60 minutes to 90 
>>minutes; please respond if you could or could not do that.
>
>I would be willing to work on a sub-group, but would prefer the second option 
>of 90 minute calls. Just worried about duplicating work, which may not 
>necessarily help in sticking to the desired timeline.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Amr