<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] P&I homework on global public interest
- To: "avri@xxxxxxx" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "GNSO-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <GNSO-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] P&I homework on global public interest
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:17:09 +0000
Thanks Avri. I obviously look at it too quickly. So you added “and its
commitment to the global public interest as outlined in the the ICANN
Articles of Incorporation” to principle B.2 and then formulated a
recommendation. That looks pretty good to me. We will confirm support for
this in our call today.
Where would you or others suggest we insert the recommendation in our report?
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 11:23 AM
To: GNSO-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] P&I homework on global public interest
Hi,
In it i both included a phrase that could be added to the principles, as was
suggested in the meeting, I think by Alan, and included a possible
recommendation.
avri
On 08-Apr-15 09:27, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Thanks Avri. Do you recommend that this be added as a principle or a
recommendation. In my personal opinion, the way it is worded seems to be a
better fit for a recommendation but I suspect it could be tweaked to read like
a recommendation.
Alan & Cheryl – Considering that both of you made comments about this last
week, what are your thoughts on Avri’s suggestion and my question?
All are welcome to comment.
Chuck
From:
owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 7:23 AM
To: GNSO-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:GNSO-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] P&I homework on global public interest
Hi,
I left the last meeting with a homework item to try and deal with the issue of
Global Public Interest and the Board's activities vis a vis responding to AC
comments while maintaining the responsibility of the GNSO for policy
recommendations.
I tried to be minimalist in offering changes. I suggest a change in principle
2 and added a recommendation.
They are in the following Drive doc for comment/suggested changes and are
appended below for reference:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Tk0wz2gBPslTv3bA44J2Ie34FOCBG6bKf9TvhpclOUc/edit?usp=sharing
avri
--
Principle
Modify from:
2. The development and implementation of policy must have a basis in and adhere
to standards of fairness, notice, transparency, integrity, objectivity,
predictability and due process consistent with ICANN's core values.
to:
2. The development and implementation of policy must have a basis in and adhere
to standards of fairness, notice, transparency, integrity, objectivity,
predictability and due process consistent with ICANN's core values and its
commitment to the global public interest as outlined in the the ICANN
Articles of Incorporation
Recommendation related to community
Perhaps we need a special section of Board responsibilities
Add:
Whenever the Board discovers that the recommendations of the GNSO do not, in
their view, reflect a broader consensus based on the advice of the Advisory
Communities or public comments, it will use existing process mechanisms to
either send the issue back to the GNSO for further consideration or initiate
broader community discussion. All final recommendations would still be the
responsibility of the GNSO.
________________________________
[Avast logo]<http://www.avast.com/>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com/>
________________________________
[Avast logo]<http://www.avast.com/>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com<http://www.avast.com/>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|