Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For review - Updated draft Final Report - Deadline for flagging issues for further consideration - Wednesday 20 May

[Olévié Kouami <olivierkouami@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1 @ Anne :-)


2015-05-19 21:43 GMT+00:00 Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>:

>  That’s why I thought staff might be able to help.
>
>
>
>   *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel*
>
> *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | *
>
> *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611*
>
> *(T) 520.629.4428 <520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <520.879.4725>*
>
> *AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>** | www.LRRLaw.com
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Graham (ELCA) [mailto:migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 19, 2015 2:29 PM
> *To:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne; Gomes, Chuck; 'Marika Konings';
> gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* RE: For review - Updated draft Final Report - Deadline for
> flagging issues for further consideration - Wednesday 20 May
>
>
>
> Not a bad idea – though it would be a projection of what process(es) MIGHT
> have been used if available and why.  Unfortunately, I do not have time to
> review this before Wednesday’s call.
>
>
>
> *Michael R. Graham*
>
> *Senior Corporate Counsel, Intellectual Property*
>
> *Expedia Legal & Corporate Affairs*
>
> *T* +1 425.679.4330 *|* *F* +1 425.679.7251
>
> *M* +1 425.241.1459
> Expedia, Inc.
> 333 108th Avenue NE *|* Bellevue *|* WA 98004
> *MiGraham@xxxxxxxxxxx <MiGraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message may contain private,
> confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this message by others
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please (i)
> contact the sender immediately; and (ii) permanently delete the original
> and any copies of the message including file attachments.  Thank you for
> your cooperation.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne [mailto:AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx
> <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:31 PM
> *To:* Michael Graham (ELCA); Gomes, Chuck; 'Marika Konings';
> gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: For review - Updated draft Final Report - Deadline for
> flagging issues for further consideration - Wednesday 20 May
>
>
>
> Michael,
>
> I think you and Chuck make good points about the type of issue involved.
> In that regard, it would be helpful  - as a check on our reasoning as a
> group – to revisit briefly the items we studied at the beginning of our
> work which were addressed on a “ad hoc” basis.
>
>
>
> Perhaps staff could take a shot at identifying which of these new
> processes would be applicable to each of those issues (instead of the ad
> hoc procedure that was actually used).
>
>
>
> Since the “ad hoc in the dark solution” is what we are trying to cure, it
> would be good to know how we anticipate that the processes we have
> developed could be used in those situations – for example,  Specification
> 13 – which new process?  Strawman Solution – which new process?  It would
> be good to know this before we release the Final Report – especially
> because Chuck might have to answer a question or two on these points when
> he gives his report to Council.
>
> Anne
>
>
>
>   *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel*
>
> *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | *
>
> *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611*
>
> *(T) 520.629.4428 <520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <520.879.4725>*
>
> *AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>** | www.LRRLaw.com
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Graham (ELCA) [mailto:migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <migraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:17 PM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Marika Konings';
> gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: For review - Updated draft Final Report - Deadline for
> flagging issues for further consideration - Wednesday 20 May
>
>
>
> I agree with Chuck’s comments – even if the possible length of time to
> completion is the same, there are differences in what would be appropriate
> to each.
>
>
>
> *Michael R. Graham*
>
> *Senior Corporate Counsel, Intellectual Property*
>
> *Expedia Legal & Corporate Affairs*
>
> *T* +1 425.679.4330 *|* *F* +1 425.679.7251
>
> *M* +1 425.241.1459
> Expedia, Inc.
> 333 108th Avenue NE *|* Bellevue *|* WA 98004
> *MiGraham@xxxxxxxxxxx <MiGraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>*
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message may contain private,
> confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this message by others
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please (i)
> contact the sender immediately; and (ii) permanently delete the original
> and any copies of the message including file attachments.  Thank you for
> your cooperation.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:32 PM
> *To:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne; 'Marika Konings'; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For review - Updated draft Final
> Report - Deadline for flagging issues for further consideration - Wednesday
> 20 May
>
>
>
> Please see my comments below Anne.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Aikman-Scalese, Anne
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:25 PM
> *To:* 'Marika Konings'; gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-wg] RE: For review - Updated draft Final
> Report - Deadline for flagging issues for further consideration - Wednesday
> 20 May
>
>
>
> Thanks Marika.   I am still a bit concerned that we will get a question as
> to why anyone would ever initiate a GGP if it takes just as long as an
> EPDP.  People might have a tendency to say  - why do a GGP when you may
> determine in that process that Consensus Policy is involved and if it will
> take just as long?  Why not just start with an EPDP and eliminate the
> complication of having two different procedures to initiate?
>
> *[Chuck Gomes] It is important to understand the following: 1) EPDP’s can
> only be used in very restricted circumstances so if the criteria are not
> met a full PDP would have to be used; 2) not all issues are appropriate for
> PDPs so in those cases a GGP might be the appropriate vehicle.*
>
>
>
> I am asking this because I think it is a question that could reasonably be
> asked by a Council Member when we make our Final Report.  I do not think
> that  “Yes, but it MIGHT be shorter” is a good answer to that question.
>
> *[Chuck Gomes] It is not just about how long it takes.  For sure, if a
> topic is eligible for policy work and a consensus policy is needed for
> enforcement, then a PDP or EPDP could be considered and should be instead
> of a GGP.  If not, then it might not matter which process was used.*
>
>
>
> I wish I had a suggestion for shortening the GGP process – or a mechanism
> for the GGP Team to determine within a fixed shorter period of time – e.g.
> 60 days, whether an EPDP is necessary.*[Chuck Gomes] * In most cases a
> topic will probably not fit the conditions for an EPDP.
>
>
>
> Anne
>
>
>
>   *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese, Of Counsel*
>
> *Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP | *
>
> *One South Church Avenue Suite 700 | Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611*
>
> *(T) 520.629.4428 <520.629.4428> | (F) 520.879.4725 <520.879.4725>*
>
> *AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx <AAikman@xxxxxxxxxx>** | www.LRRLaw.com
> <http://www.lrrlaw.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> <owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Marika Konings
> *Sent:* Monday, May 18, 2015 6:26 AM
> *To:* gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [gnso-policyimpl-wg] For review - Updated draft Final Report -
> Deadline for flagging issues for further consideration - Wednesday 20 May
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Please find attached the latest version of the draft Policy &
> Implementation Final Report. This version includes the changes made during
> last week’s PI meeting as well as proposed language to reflect that the GGP
> and IRT should not be used to re-open previously dealt with policy issues
> (note, I’ve marked these changes with a comment). You’ll also find included
> a new annex H with the estimated timelines. Staff comments that were
> addressed during the last meeting have been removed, but please note that
> there are a still a couple of staff comments in Annex I and K that have not
> been discussed yet.
>
>
>
> As noted before, please flag any other items that require further
> discussion by the WG prior to the WG meeting on Wednesday 20 May.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> *From: *Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Date: *Wednesday 13 May 2015 22:47
> *To: *"gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject: *[gnso-policyimpl-wg] Deadline for flagging issues for further
> consideration - Wednesday 20 May
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Following today’s meeting, please note that the deadline for flagging any
> other items that need further consideration by the WG in relation to the
> draft Final Report is *next Wednesday 20 May* prior to the PI WG meeting
> *.* For your convenience, you’ll find the latest draft attached. Note
> that an updated version incorporating the issues discussed during today’s
> meeting will be circulated early next week.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>



-- 
Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI
Responsable du Projet CERGI Education
Directeur-Adjoint de KT Technologies Informatiques sarl
SG de ESTETIC  - Association Togolaise des professionnels des TIC (
http://www.estetic.tg)
ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.icann.org/ et
http://www.npoc.org/)
Membre du FOSSFA (www.fossfa.net) et Membre de de Internet Society (
www.isoc.org)
BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé – Togo