Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: GNSO Bylaws changes - recommendations from the Policy & Implementation WG

[Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a great idea Chuck, I will discuss with our group about this idea.
SP

On 2016-03-08 5:36, Burr, Becky wrote:
> that’s a very interesting idea Chuck
>
> *J. Beckwith Burr****
> **Neustar, Inc.***/**Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
> *Office:***+1.202.533.2932 *Mobile:***+1.202.352.6367 */**neustar.biz* 
> <http://www.neustar.biz>
>
> From: <Gomes>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM
> To: "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: GNSO Bylaws changes - 
> recommendations from the Policy & Implementation WG
> FYI.  Note that three key implementation action items as Mary says 
> below have been completed.
> I would like to encourage all of us to be diligent about reminding 
> members of the ICANN community that our recommendations have been 
> approved by the Board.  I was surprised the last two days in Marrakech 
> to hear two different Board members make statements indicating that 
> the policy vs. implementation issue was still unresolved and I took 
> the opportunity in each case to set the record straight.  Also, 
> someone (I do not remember who at the moment) yesterday made a great 
> suggestion to me: that comments be submitted in the comment period for 
> the proposed CCWG Framework recommendation that the P&I WG 
> recommendations for the GNSO be added as applicable to the CCWG 
> Framework.  I plan to encourage the RySG to do this in their 
> comments.  Some of you may want to consider doing something similar in 
> your groups.  In the CWG Stewardship Implementation session yesterday 
> afternoon the need for this in CCWGs became very evident.
> Chuck
>
> *From:*Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 08, 2016 4:55 AM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* Marika Konings
> *Subject:* GNSO Bylaws changes - recommendations from the Policy & 
> Implementation WG
> Dear Chuck,
>
> I just wanted to follow up on your question the other day, about the 
> Board adoption of the Bylaws and related changes recommended by the 
> Policy & Implementation Working Group.
> The Board approved all the recommendations at its 28 September 2015 
> meeting, following the close of the requisite public comment period: 
> https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-09-28-en#2.f 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_board-2Dmaterial_resolutions-2D2015-2D09-2D28-2Den-232.f&d=CwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=uqnZPud0A4pkVN8yKpvCNo9iybODJKWTDPXC_od_ChI&s=91uA2hS_Uz5uqCv2zEJGb4RijcC2jZzyCYG4NLn4Mv0&e=>
> The Bylaws have now been updated and published: 
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en#AnnexA1 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_governance_bylaws-2Den-23AnnexA1&d=CwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=uqnZPud0A4pkVN8yKpvCNo9iybODJKWTDPXC_od_ChI&s=C_r7Y9Tx3pF7CsHnHWXvC3dslCYq6vMvwjVpuCxE2iU&e=> 
>
> The GNSO Operating Procedures have also been updated and published: 
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/procedures 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_procedures&d=CwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=uqnZPud0A4pkVN8yKpvCNo9iybODJKWTDPXC_od_ChI&s=V27ZfKmeB3vvWvrm86MhhyQJ6mnIdK4n--eyUnGRPFA&e=>
> I hope this helps!
>
> Cheers
>
> Mary