ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-policyimpl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: GNSO Bylaws changes - recommendations from the Policy & Implementation WG

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: GNSO Bylaws changes - recommendations from the Policy & Implementation WG
  • From: "Burr, Becky" <Becky.Burr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:36:42 +0000

that’s a very interesting idea Chuck

J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / 
neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz>

From: <Gomes>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 10:33 AM
To: "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: GNSO Bylaws changes - recommendations from 
the Policy & Implementation WG

FYI.  Note that three key implementation action items as Mary says below have 
been completed.

I would like to encourage all of us to be diligent about reminding members of 
the ICANN community that our recommendations have been approved by the Board.  
I was surprised the last two days in Marrakech to hear two different Board 
members make statements indicating that the policy vs. implementation issue was 
still unresolved and I took the opportunity in each case to set the record 
straight.  Also, someone (I do not remember who at the moment) yesterday made a 
great suggestion to me: that comments be submitted in the comment period for 
the proposed CCWG Framework recommendation that the P&I WG recommendations for 
the GNSO be added as applicable to the CCWG Framework.  I plan to encourage the 
RySG to do this in their comments.  Some of you may want to consider doing 
something similar in your groups.  In the CWG Stewardship Implementation 
session yesterday afternoon the need for this in CCWGs became very evident.

Chuck

From: Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 4:55 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Marika Konings
Subject: GNSO Bylaws changes - recommendations from the Policy & Implementation 
WG

Dear Chuck,

I just wanted to follow up on your question the other day, about the Board 
adoption of the Bylaws and related changes recommended by the Policy & 
Implementation Working Group.

The Board approved all the recommendations at its 28 September 2015 meeting, 
following the close of the requisite public comment period: 
https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-09-28-en#2.f<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_board-2Dmaterial_resolutions-2D2015-2D09-2D28-2Den-232.f&d=CwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=uqnZPud0A4pkVN8yKpvCNo9iybODJKWTDPXC_od_ChI&s=91uA2hS_Uz5uqCv2zEJGb4RijcC2jZzyCYG4NLn4Mv0&e=>

The Bylaws have now been updated and published: 
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en#AnnexA1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resources_pages_governance_bylaws-2Den-23AnnexA1&d=CwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=uqnZPud0A4pkVN8yKpvCNo9iybODJKWTDPXC_od_ChI&s=C_r7Y9Tx3pF7CsHnHWXvC3dslCYq6vMvwjVpuCxE2iU&e=>

The GNSO Operating Procedures have also been updated and published: 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/procedures<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_council_procedures&d=CwMGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=uqnZPud0A4pkVN8yKpvCNo9iybODJKWTDPXC_od_ChI&s=V27ZfKmeB3vvWvrm86MhhyQJ6mnIdK4n--eyUnGRPFA&e=>

I hope this helps!

Cheers
Mary



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy