Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: GNSO Bylaws changes - recommendations from the Policy & Implementation WG

[Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think that would help Marika....when you do a simple Google search 
(which one is apt to do when one is totally frustrated with the ICANN 
website search function) you wind up at the Wikispace. Fellows also 
indicated that they have a hard time figuring out where to look.  
Labelling the wikispace as finished, and heading the page with a link to 
the final report would really help.  I hate to suggest more work for you 
folks in policy because I know how hard you are already working, I think 
this is really an information management function that should be turned 
over to our librarian/archivist team.
cheers Stephanie

On 2016-03-18 18:43, Marika Konings wrote:
> And I probably should have added that the wiki space should be seen as 
> the work space of the WG – the authoritative space for any GNSO 
> documents is the GNSO web-site - maybe that is something we can make 
> more clear on the wiki site (as well as archiving those wiki pages of 
> groups that have completed their efforts).
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Friday 18 March 2016 at 16:39
> To: Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, Chuck Gomes 
> <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
> "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
> <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: GNSO Bylaws changes - 
> recommendations from the Policy & Implementation WG
> Hi Stephanie,
>
> All final work products are posted on the GNSO web-site under the 
> active projects heading 
> (http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active). The Final Policy & 
> Implementation WG report can be found here: 
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/policy-implementation together 
> with all other milestone documents.
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> From: <owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:owner-gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>> on behalf of Stephanie 
> Perrin <stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Friday 18 March 2016 at 16:27
> To: Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>, 
> "gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>" 
> <gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:gnso-policyimpl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-policyimpl-wg] FW: GNSO Bylaws changes - 
> recommendations from the Policy & Implementation WG
> I was browsing through the working group wiki, looking for our final 
> report.  I will admit to finding the ICANN website a maze that defeats 
> me at times (to be more accurate, at most times).  I could only find 
> our redline version....I wonder, if someone forgot what had happened 
> to the report, and they searched the ICANN site for it, would they 
> find our final report, or the redline version which leaves one 
> wondering what happened to it?
> I ask this partly because the issue of finding final reports came up 
> at the NCSG/NCUC meetings we recently had in Marrakech....some of our 
> next gen new members said they were having a hard time navigating the 
> site, weaving through dead links, and figuring out the status of 
> groups.  Perhaps we need finding aids for our archived materials and 
> completed processes....
> Kind regards, Stephanie Perrin
>
> On 2016-03-08 5:33, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > FYI.  Note that three key implementation action items as Mary says 
> > below have been completed.
> > I would like to encourage all of us to be diligent about reminding 
> > members of the ICANN community that our recommendations have been 
> > approved by the Board.  I was surprised the last two days in 
> > Marrakech to hear two different Board members make statements 
> > indicating that the policy vs. implementation issue was still 
> > unresolved and I took the opportunity in each case to set the record 
> > straight.  Also, someone (I do not remember who at the moment) 
> > yesterday made a great suggestion to me: that comments be submitted 
> > in the comment period for the proposed CCWG Framework recommendation 
> > that the P&I WG recommendations for the GNSO be added as applicable 
> > to the CCWG Framework.  I plan to encourage the RySG to do this in 
> > their comments.  Some of you may want to consider doing something 
> > similar in your groups.  In the CWG Stewardship Implementation 
> > session yesterday afternoon the need for this in CCWGs became very 
> > evident.
> > Chuck
> >
> > *From:*Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx]
> > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 08, 2016 4:55 AM
> > *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> > *Cc:* Marika Konings
> > *Subject:* GNSO Bylaws changes - recommendations from the Policy & 
> > Implementation WG
> > Dear Chuck,
> >
> > I just wanted to follow up on your question the other day, about the 
> > Board adoption of the Bylaws and related changes recommended by the 
> > Policy & Implementation Working Group.
> > The Board approved all the recommendations at its 28 September 2015 
> > meeting, following the close of the requisite public comment period: 
> > https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-09-28-en#2.f
> > The Bylaws have now been updated and published: 
> > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en#AnnexA1
> > The GNSO Operating Procedures have also been updated and published: 
> > http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/procedures
> > I hope this helps!
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Mary