Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Staff Memorandum on Voting Requirements for Consensus Policies

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Avri,

What is the open question?  GNSO Supermajority is defined in the bylaws.  What 
am I missing?


Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
Vice President, Law & Policy
NeuStar, Inc.
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx



----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed Apr 14 18:13:39 2010
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Staff Memorandum on Voting Requirements for 
Consensus Policies



On 14 Apr 2010, at 17:48, Margie Milam wrote:

> <MEMO On Voting Thresholds.pdf>

thanks for this document.

I think the recommendation, makes sense, 

> Staff proposes that the GNSO Supermajority Vote apply in all instances where 
> the GNSO Council intends to adopt onsensus policies to be enforceable against 
> all registrars and registries.


but I do think we need to do a better job of explicitly defining what 
Supermajority vote means in the bicameral setup if contractual enforcement 
depends on it.  

This may require some cooperation with GCOT.

a.