Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Staff Memorandum on Voting Requirements for Consensus Policies

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Maybe it is only me, but it is not defined directly.  If it only defined 
indirectly in relation to another issue.  I am just suggesting that there 
should be a clause that says supermajority in the GNSO council is defined as 
....

a.

On 14 Apr 2010, at 18:34, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Avri,
> 
> What is the open question?  GNSO Supermajority is defined in the bylaws.  
> What am I missing?
> 
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wed Apr 14 18:13:39 2010
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Staff Memorandum on Voting Requirements for 
> Consensus Policies
> 
> 
> 
> On 14 Apr 2010, at 17:48, Margie Milam wrote:
> 
>> <MEMO On Voting Thresholds.pdf>
> 
> thanks for this document.
> 
> I think the recommendation, makes sense, 
> 
>> Staff proposes that the GNSO Supermajority Vote apply in all instances where 
>> the GNSO Council intends to adopt onsensus policies to be enforceable 
>> against all registrars and registries.
> 
> 
> but I do think we need to do a better job of explicitly defining what 
> Supermajority vote means in the bicameral setup if contractual enforcement 
> depends on it.  
> 
> This may require some cooperation with GCOT.
> 
> a.