<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ppsc-pdp] Re: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
- To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Re: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:58:02 -0500
Hi,
ok, i will desist.
though i still believe there is a serious problem.
a.
On 9 Dec 2010, at 09:47, J. Scott Evans wrote:
> Avri, et al.
>
> I totally disagree with this message and its implied meaning. Jeff is a
> dedicated volunteer and has the highest ethics I know of. I totally stand
> behind him. What conflict is here? Is there a conflict of interest because
> he believes the current structure is fine and he is willing to volunteer his
> valuable time. I know you are disappointed with the outcome of yesterday's
> GNSO Council meeting, but this is the wrong issue for you to be "beating your
> drum about."
>
> J. Scott
> j. scott evans - senior legal director, global brand and trademarks - Yahoo!
> Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
> From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx; "Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 4:22:45 PM
> Subject: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
>
>
> hi,
>
> As I have done before in other circumstances, I question the legitimacy of
> having a chair for the PPSC or the PDP WT who has ascended to the GNSO
> council and is one of its vice-chairs I believe that the influence a
> council member, who is in the position of approving or disapproving the work
> of PPSC and its WTs is not consistent with also being a Chair of either the
> PPSC or of a WT.
>
> This is a personal question at this point, but I will be forwarding this note
> to the NCSG to seek their advice on the issue.
>
> thanks
>
> a
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|