<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ppsc-pdp] Re: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Re: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
- From: "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 06:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Avri, et al.
I totally disagree with this message and its implied meaning. Jeff is a
dedicated volunteer and has the highest ethics I know of. I totally stand
behind him. What conflict is here? Is there a conflict of interest because he
believes the current structure is fine and he is willing to volunteer his
valuable time. I know you are disappointed with the outcome of yesterday's
GNSO Council meeting, but this is the wrong issue for you to be "beating your
drum about."
J. Scottj. scott evans - senior legal director, global brand and trademarks -
Yahoo! Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
To: gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx; "Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 4:22:45 PM
Subject: [gnso-ppsc] question of conflict of interest
hi,
As I have done before in other circumstances, I question the legitimacy of
having a chair for the PPSC or the PDP WT who has ascended to the GNSO council
and is one of its vice-chairs I believe that the influence a council member,
who is in the position of approving or disapproving the work of PPSC and its
WTs is not consistent with also being a Chair of either the PPSC or of a WT.
This is a personal question at this point, but I will be forwarding this note
to the NCSG to seek their advice on the issue.
thanks
a
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|