Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Updated outstanding issues document

[Marilyn <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I apologize for having to drop off early... Was chairing my constituency, so 
had to go....I understand concerns about human rights and other rights, but I 
still believe we need to be careful about expanding into areas of non 
competency....I PREFER STICKING W public interest statement from AoC.... 
In this time of discussion about human rights, broadly, hard not to question 
icann's role..... But is in need of careful consideration.... And caution. 

Other wise may be putting icon gnso pdp process into roles w /compentency....
Marilyn Cade/Sent from my iPad

On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear All,
> 
> Please find attached an updated version of the outstanding issues document, 
> including notes from yesterday's meeting. These are the remaining action 
> items:
> Recommendation # 18 - There was support for modifying the recommendation so 
> that it would highlight that dialogue between GNSO Council members and the 
> requesting AC would be adesirable option to pursue following a vote against 
> the initiation of a PDPeither to better understand the reasons for declining 
> a PDP and/or determining whether there would be options to modify the request 
> so that it would receive support. Alan agreed to draft language for 
> consideration by the WT.
> Recommendation #13 – Please review proposed modification to recommendation 
> #13 (It was proposed to add human rights in square brackets to allow for 
> further input during the public comment period. In addition, it was agreed to 
> track the language of the AoC – see proposed modification in attached 
> document).
> With best regards,
> 
> Marika
> <Outstanding Issues  Updated 1 Feburary 2011.doc>