[gnso-ppsc-pdp] RE: Updated outstanding issues document + action items

["David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>]

Re: Rec. #21 - I don't see any good reason to provide a special status for the 
comments from ACs and SOs, requiring direct response.
David W. Maher
Senior Vice President - Law & Policy
Public Interest Registry


From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:42 AM
To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Updated outstanding issues document + action items

Dear All,

Please find attached the updated outstanding issues document, including notes 
from our call today. As a reminder, these are some of the remaining action 
items:

 *   Recommendation # 18 - There was support for modifying the recommendation 
so that it would highlight that dialogue between GNSO Council members and the 
requesting AC would be adesirable option to pursue following a vote against the 
initiation of a PDPeither to better understand the reasons for declining a PDP 
and/or determining whether there would be options to modify the request so that 
it would receive support. Alan agreed to draft language for consideration by 
the WT.
 *   Recommendation # 21 -  One WT member also suggested that the 
recommendation should include that a response needs to be provided to an SO/AC 
that submits comments. It was agreed to circulate the proposed language on the 
mailing list to obtain further input on this issue. The proposed language is as 
follows: "Comments from ACs and SOs should receive a direct response from the 
WG". (WG Members are encouraged to provide feedback on this proposed language.)
Best regards,

Marika