Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Questions / comments - the meaning of "act"

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Becuase it outside context.

The only things sent to the Board are things that have at least passed with a 
majority.

By selective quoting you have made it look like this could even apply to things 
that did not have a majority vote.  And that is not quite true.

a.

On 21 Feb 2011, at 21:55, Neuman, Jeff wrote:

> Avri,
> 
> I cut and paste the text exactly from the bylaws.  No editorializing, no 
> changes...literally word for word.  That is why the quotes.
> 
> How can that be "not quite true"?  
> 
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.
> Vice President, Law & Policy
> NeuStar, Inc.
> Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 03:49 PM
> To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-ppsc-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Questions / comments - the meaning of "act"
> 
> 
> 
> On 21 Feb 2011, at 20:58, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> 
>> "In any case in which the Council is not able to reach GNSO Supermajority 
>> vote, a majority vote of the Board will be sufficient to act."
> 
> 
> Not quite true,  it is only true in cases where the council reached a 
> majority vote.
> 
> In any case in which the Council is not able to reach GNSO Supermajority vote 
> but reaches a majority vote, a majority vote of the Board will be sufficient 
> to act. on the GNSO's recommendation."
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
>