ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-ppsc-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Final Version - GNSO Working Group Guidelines

  • To: Caroline Greer <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>, "J. Scott Evans" <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Final Version - GNSO Working Group Guidelines
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 02:50:06 -0700

Hi Caroline,

Comment 3 is in my view correct. All WG meetings are normally recorded and 
transcriptions are provided. Maybe you are thinking of the live scribing, which 
is indeed not normal practice?

I’m happy to include your proposed edit on comment 4, unless there is any 
objection from other members in the WG.

In relation to comment 6, the Chairs checklist, it was my understanding that 
this checklist related to the first meeting of the WG, not every meeting, so 
adding a check for DOIs for every meeting would require a separate check list 
or further explanation.

I would like to encourage other members of the WT to share their views, 
especially if they differ from my interpretation.

Thanks,

Marika


On 31/05/10 11:41, "Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Marika.

I am surprised that of my six comments, comments 3,4 and perhaps even 6 are 
considered as ‘substantial’. To me, they are more common sense edits and/or a 
reflection of what actually happens in WG situations.

I have included those 3 comments again below. Are we really not able to include 
them? I’d hate to be bothering the PPSC with such minor issues.

Many thanks,

Caroline.

3. The last sentence of the second paragraph of Section 4.1 says, “As described 
above, meetings are normally recorded and transcribed.”  Perhaps we should 
change this to “As described above, meetings are normally recorded or 
transcribed" as both rarely happen from what I understand.

4. The last sentence of the first paragraph on page 20 says, “If funding is 
required to organize such a meeting (e.g. travel expenses), a request should be 
made to the Chartering Organization for approval.”  It might be good to add 
"with as much advance notice as possible".


6. Finally, in Annex I, Chairs Checklist, we might want to add a check for 
Disclosures of Interest in each meeting when new issues are being discussed.




From: owner-gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: 31 May 2010 10:30
To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr; J. Scott Evans; gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Final Version - GNSO Working Group Guidelines

Dear All,

Please find attached the final version of the Working Group Guidelines, 
incorporating / addressing the comments and edits provided by Avri, J. Scott 
and Cheryl. In relation to Caroline’s comments, apart from comment 1, I did not 
include her other suggestions as these seemed to be more substantial than just 
edits and therefore requiring further discussion by the WT, noting that there 
will be an opportunity to address these in the PPSC discussions. I hope this is 
acceptable.

If there are any other edits /typos that need fixing, please let me know as 
soon as possible, but no later than 18.00 UTC today (Monday 31 May). Following 
that, I will submit the document for posting.

Thanks!

Marika

On 31/05/10 10:55, "Cheryl Langdon-Orr" <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Only thing I noted in the version sent was an odd bit odf what looked like 
'comment' still in line in the Page 1 Sec 1.1 Background, paragraph 2 line 4 
from :...and; secondly, what guidance should be provided to a WG on elements 
such as structuring, norming is this a word?  perhaps 'setting norms' would be 
less neologistic, tasking, reporting, and delivering the outcome(s) as 
chartered (the working group process)."   that needs fixing...


Cheryl Langdon-Orr
(CLO)



On 31 May 2010 10:53, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sent attachment in second email.  Sorry for the confusion!

On Sun May 30th, 2010 5:32 PM PDT Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:

>I saw no attachment of the mark up file :?
> But I'm sure they would be agreeable...
>
>Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>(CLO)
>
>
>
>On 31 May 2010 10:18, J. Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I like Avri's fix to the GNSO issue.  I have made just a few editorial
>> revisions on top of Avri's comments.
>>
>> j. scott evans - senior legal director, global brand and trademarks -
>> Yahoo! Inc. - 408.349.1385 - jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
>> *To:* Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
>> *Cc:* J. Scott Scott Evans <jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx>
>> *Sent:* Wed, May 26, 2010 1:28:00 PM
>> *Subject:* edit pass
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> it was such an enthralling read, i went through to the end - and this after
>> asking for an extension.
>>
>> i did a lot of markup and tried to propose some solution to the GNSO-CO
>> issue.  might have gone too far, but do not think i did anything
>> substantial.
>>
>> i also pointed out some areas that might need a patch or two.
>>
>> i am fine with shipping it once these or equivalent fixes are made.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> a.
>>
>>








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy