[gnso-ppsc] RE: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Revised WG Team Charter with proposed Section II
- To: "Konstantinos Komaitis" <k.komaitis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "PPSC" <gnso-ppsc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ppsc] RE: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Revised WG Team Charter with proposed Section II
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:09:09 -0500
I agree with your revised wording on drawing form the other groups.
With respect to the language on the chair, lets discuss during the call.
Personally I believe the chair must be a member of the PPSC (even if
that means adding the person to the PPSC after he or she is elected to
the chair position).
We can discuss further.
Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq.: NeuStar, Inc.
Vice President, Law & Policy
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Konstantinos Komaitis
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 10:33 AM
To: Avri Doria; PPSC
Cc: Working Group
Subject: Re: [gnso-ppsc-wg] Revised WG Team Charter with proposed
I agree here with Avri that our language should be more flexible to
reflect the work and role of the WG team. Another thing I would comment
"The BGC-WG recommended that steps be taken immediately to move to a
working group model for future policy development work in the GNSO,
developing appropriate operating principles, rules and procedures and
suggests drawing upon expertise gained from policy development in the
IETF, W3C, RIRs and other organizations."
I am quite skeptical about the last part of this sentence "suggests
drawing upon expertise gained from policy development in the IETF,
W3C,RIPs and other organisations" - although I see the validity of this
statement, these organizations have different sets of goals and thus
have implemented different sets of procedures. Therefore, I would add
here: "and suggests, where appropriate and necessary, drawing upon
On 07/01/2009 05:05, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6 Jan 2009, at 15:29, J. Scott Evans wrote:
> Hopefully, this help spur robust discussion during tomorrow's call.
ok i'll quibble:
> Participation by team members on other work teams (including the
> GNSO Policy Development Process Team) should be minimized if not
> totally avoided so as to:
i think it is enough to say minimized, i think the 'if not totally
avoided' is problematic overkill
> 7. The chair of the Working Group Team will be someone from the
> and shall not be a GNSO Council member..
while i agree with the sentimens and he drive, i think we should avoid
such prohibiions - i would prefer to see something like:
... and should not be
... and preferably should be someone other then a GNSO Council member.
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Lecturer in Law,
GigaNet Membership Chair,
University of Strathclyde,
The Lord Hope Building,
141 St. James Road,
Glasgow, G4 0LT,
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306